khalilog khalilog
  • 16-08-2018
  • Biology
contestada

why it is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted.

Respuesta :

mthomas072017 mthomas072017
  • 16-08-2018

Its important to do so because you never are completely sure on if the scientist is completely accurate and that they have done everything right, that is why every scientist retraces another scientists steps and completely redoes the experiment themselves. Your trying to make sure that your work and factual evidence is 100% accurate and wont be able to be proved wrong

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Is supports combustion a chemical or physical property
Which points have an x value less than zero? A.  X, C  B.  P, L  C.  C, D, J  D.  D, J, E
In 1876, the first separate graduate school was established A. at Harvard by Charles W. Eliot. B. by the Morrill Land Grant Act. C. at Radcliffe. D. at Johns H
ak - r = on, for k please help
What is the basic function of meiosis, and why is it necessary?
Which of the following best describes the Harlem Renaissance? (A) The rehabilitation of a decaying urban area (B) An outpouring of Black artistic and literary
What shape has 4 sides that are different lengths
How has the bill of rights been important in american history since 1791?
By the end of the seventeenth century, which of the following was true of women in New England? (A) They had begun to challenge their subordinate role in societ
spain controlled florida and vest areas _____ of the mississippi river