philophobicbabie philophobicbabie
  • 19-11-2020
  • History
contestada

miranda v arizona precedent

Respuesta :

daleen08
daleen08 daleen08
  • 19-11-2020
Only if you give brainliest
Answer Link
beyonce122a
beyonce122a beyonce122a
  • 19-11-2020

Answer:

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. ... The court disagreed, however, and upheld the conviction.

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Where do plants get the carbon they use to make organic molecules?
what is a weasel word?
what is a weasel word?
can you tell me what is Truthiness?
If 5x + 15 is greater than 20, which of the following best describes possible values of x ?a) x > 5, b) x > 3, c) x > 1, d) x < 5, e) x < 1
A man wishes to cover his floor with tiles, each one measuring 3/4 inch by 2 inches. If his room is a rectangle, measuring 12 feet by 18 feet, how many such ti
Mosaics are constructed from small pieces of stone called what?
5/6 - 2/6 in simplest form
The price of an item increased by 25%. If the price of the item after the increase is $2, find the original price.a) $1.50, b) $1.60, c) $1.75, d) $2.50, e) $3.
which is more important,friendship or justice