contestada

Half an hour after Ötzi dined, the killer came along and shot him in the back from a distance of almost 100 feet. The arrow went under his left armpit . . . a wound that would have been quickly fatal and probably not treatable even in modern times, especially where it happened. By the angle of the wound, he was either shot from below and behind, or he had been bent forward when he was hit from above and behind. –“Who Killed the Iceman? Clues Emerge in a Very Cold Case,” Rod Nordland Which statement describes information that is relevant to understanding how Ötzi may have died? He had just eaten. He dropped his arrow. He was shot in the back. He had been bent forward.

Respuesta :

Parrain

Based on the excerpt from Clues Emerge in a Very Cold Case,” Rod Nordland, the statement that describes the relevant information to how Otzi may have died is He was shot in the back.

How can we understand how Otzi may have died?

The information that is related to how Otzi may have died would be any information that talks about who killed him, how he was killed, and the effects of the killing technique used.

The detail that talks about how Otzi was shot in the back would explain how he was killed and so it is relevant to how Otzi may have died.

The other options are incorrect because telling us that he had just eaten does not let us know how he died, and neither would telling us that he bent forward or dropped his arrow because none of these things are fatal to a person.

In conclusion, the statement that provides information on how Otzi died is that he was shot in the back.

Find out more on Otzi the Iceman at https://brainly.com/question/24267508

#SPJ1

Answer:d c b

Explanation:

half and hour of that

Otras preguntas